Customer World

Preparing for a world when customer transactional behaviour changes!

The way customers pay and transact is undergoing a huge change. Today, most financial institutions have a trail of the payments, spends or usage in their transactional systems thro' many traditional payment methods. But, as these trends below show, there is a huge new revolution underway. If you are in the business of customer data & insight mining or in marketing to these customers, then get ready for paradigm shift in tracking & influencing their purchases.( Thanks David for this post)

Take a look at the trends:

1. Digital money
According to AC Nielsen, 90% of transactions in the US will be cashless by the year 2020. PayPal already has 63 million accounts, which makes it larger than most national banks,while in Korea during the month of June 2004, 300,000 people purchased cellphones into which you can insert a memory card containing all your financial data. So will physical money soon be a thing of the past? Most observers say yes, but don’t underestimate the power of human nature and tradition.

2. Contactless payment
McDonald’s is testing ‘contactless’ payment technologies in the US (and elsewhere). Just drive-in, grab your goods and drive off. Payment is made automatically by a wireless device on your windscreen linked to your bank account. Mobile phones can and will do much the same thing.

3. Pre-pay and stored value cards
10 million households in the US don’t have bank accounts and many of these use their pay cheques to buy pre-paid credit cards. Around 8.5% of households without bank accounts own pre-paid credit cards but this figure is expected to rise to 25% by the end of 2006. This is one reason why companies like Visa and MasterCard are getting into the act by signing up Rap moguls and singers like Russell Simmons and Usher to put their names on prepaid cards.

4. Private currencies
Pre-pay is a type of private currency in that you can restrict where people spend their money, in some cases to a single brand, outlet or service. This is good news for loyalty and also good (or bad) news for privacy depending on your point of view. For example, parents can give their children pre-paid cards with certain categories or locations locked off. However, the big news in private currencies is what’s happening in the air and in cyberspace. According to the Economist magazine, airmiles are now technically more valuable than the US dollar while over in cyberspace gamers are exchanging cyber dollars for the real thing.

5. Debt
The level of credit card debt in Britain has increased by 73% since 1997. The UK now holds 60% of all credit cards issued in Europe and has 75% of all European credit card debt. Spending on credit cards now represents 11% of GDP and 40% of people say they expect to use their cards more with the advent of new technology. Meanwhile, the amount owed to credit card companies in the UK now stands at GBP £53 billion. Figures for other countries such as the US and Australia are following a broadly similar trend. So what happens if (when) interest rates really go up? Trouble, that’s what.

6. Everyone is a bank
If everyone from supermarkets and search engines to phone companies and airlines offer banking services where does this leave the banks? The answer could be as back office low margin sub-contractors or maybe banks will re-frame themselves as ‘wealthcare’ businesses.

7. Micropayments
Once upon a time people used credit cards for big purchases like holidays. Not any more. Now you can buy a 99cent song on i-Tunes with your credit card or charge your hamburger at McDonald’s to your plastic. In 2004 the average credit card transaction in the US was $67.81. Back in 1999 it was $72.83. Add to this the possibilities created by contactless payment, stored value cards and pre-pay and you have a recipe for radical change in the financial services sector.

8. Proof of identity
With cases of identity theft going through the roof in most countries, there will be a boom for companies and technologies offering electronic and other forms of identity verification. There will also be an increase in products and services aimed at helping people get their identify back after its been stolen.

9. Mobile phones becoming wallets
Have you noticed how fewer people are wearing watches these days? Under the age of 21 a watch is almost a novelty as people use their mobile phones to tell the time instead. And so, the theory goes, phones will replace wallets too as people find it more convenient to carry their cash digitally inside their phones.

10. The death of cheques
  Seriously, who under the age of thirty uses cheques these days?

Inside Steve's Brain- customer-centric design thinking

Here's an overview of the new book that's just got released - Inside Steve's brain ( Nishad sent this to me a few hours ago). Personally, it tells me a lot about the way the man is thinking, pushing( the people around him), acting-on( his instincts) and executing( without being worried about what the world thinks about him). Customer-centric enterprises need to have customer-centric design thinking - the way their products need to be conceived, designed and delivered. Steve just does it with impeccable perfection and style.    Here's the preview before you rush-out to buy:

| View | Upload your own

Lead management - Involve before you start!

A recent study from the Sales Lead Management Association (SLMA)  shows that many companies are ignoring their sales lead management.

Their 2nd annual Sales Lead Management Study, conducted with 144 businesses in Southern California, revealed the following results:

• 68.8% don’t qualify leads before sending them to their sales teams
• 52.4% have no formal process for compiling sales forecast reports
• 82.8% don’t track ROI for lead generation investments
• 55% rated low satisfaction with their SFA/CRM system, at 5 or less on a 10-point scale
• 52.1% use no SFA/CRM system to track the lead process

My View:  The gap between sales & marketing departments has only grown over the years.Sales has had a siloed process in enterprises and in my experience getting sales to see & appreciate good quality leads is always big problem. On the other hand, I have always found, lack of understanding what a good lead is the problem of most lead generation programs. Often there is a mix of science, logic and an intuitive feeling in the salesperson's mind which a software or a process cannot replicate. But, my belief is that right at the inception of a lead generation program, you need to have the buy-in of the sales team. The lead generation team must be 'considered' a part of the sales team and may be that's the reason there's a term coined as 'inside sales'! Nevertheless, the lead generation team, the software and the process must be seamlessly integrated to succeed. It has to start before the program is implemented and announced. That's the key to its success.

The laws of physics behind marketing methods

I read an interesting post about how the rules of mass marketing, direct marketing & social media are so different in approach, content, analysis and results. Therefore, for marketers, the challenge of applying & measuring each of them is conflicting, different & downright confusing. The truth though is that data(at an individual customer level) is becoming the DNA for marketing and incremental byte-sized data from each of them come at different points of time - controlled to near-real to real.The key, therefore, is knowing how to use it, apply it basis the method of marketing marketers are executing or seeking solutions for, not making the mistake of transposing one type of marketing hypothesis to the other etc. are key factors of being a successful marketer tomorrow.

Take a look:

Mass advertising is like Classical Physics; large-scale, mostly intuitive and somewhat predictable.

Direct Marketing is like Atomic Physics; small/medium-scale, mostly logical, but the segmentation aspects start to show some bumps and troughs on what appeared to be smooth and simple.

Social Media is more like Quantum Physics; small-scale, counter-intuitive and usually unpredictable.

• Traditional marketers deal with everyones opinions in big bins like sales figures, national focus groups, opinion polls, etc. These roll-ups average out the inconsistencies of individuals and blur together to form tendencies, trends and preferences. The actions taken in mass marketing can expect a relatively consistent result (i.e. send out a coupon and you can expect a certain level of redemption and sales revenue to come from it and the larger the audience, the more likely it is to average out at a predictable result). This is the world that marketers are familiar with and all-in-all it makes sense if you know the system.

• Social Media on the other hand acts on the niche and individual level where things are a lot less certain. The complex nature of blog posts is hard to parse out into definitive numbers and trends.The lack of large numbers makes the reaction and result of social media efforts difficult to determine and measure. It is much more difficult to roll up all of these disparate opinions into a meaningful decision than to look at an opinion pie-chart.So in essence, social media tools have given marketers a microscope powerful enough to see what is going on at smaller scales.

...many marketers in the classical camp are not very happy with what they see, because it doesn’t confirm what they thought they knew. Decisions which appear obvious when looking at large sample sizes becomes more nuanced and contradictory when you see everyone as an individual.

How do measure Customer Engagement?

MarketingNPV provides an in-depth point of view on measuring engagement. This is a complex and evolving subject in marketing. The key however is to start small, keep defining & redefining it, see the results and keep improving it all the time. I think customer engagement must include all touchpoints beyond just net, blogs. It should include store visits, branch visits, call centre, product usage, cross-product holding, depth of features & benefits used by the customer etc.

Take a look at how they see it:

Two Types of Engagement

There are two generally accepted engagement “types”: emotional engagement and behavioral engagement. The former is more popular; the latter is more important.

Behavioral Engagement

It’s important to note that behavioral engagement is not limited to a purchase of a product or service; it encompasses all the interactions that a prospect or customer has in relation to a brand. There are any number of pre- or post-sale activities that can be (directly or indirectly) predictive of a future purchase or re-purchase; they include visiting a Web site, downloading a whitepaper, calling customer service, recommending a product, or even commenting on a blog.

There’s plenty of data available to track how customers or prospects are engaging with a company; the key is to synthesize it into a clear model for demonstrating either short- or long-term economic benefit.

To probe more deeply into these drivers, your next step will be to identify places on the map where you have good data and where you don’t. Look beyond the traditional customer survey information, brand-tracking studies, and the CRM system. What Web analytics are you capturing? Do you have access to point-of-sale data or call-center transcripts?

The key to measuring engagement is:

a. Develop a vision
b. Create a methodical testing process
c. Look for predictive validity of upstream behaviours
d. Leverage your engagement drivers

Marketing - How is it changing?

Forrester, has come-up with some research around emerging trends in marketing ( ahead of their Marketing Forum 2008) - Engagement is becoming an important metric. Key highlights include:

Marketing leaders steer based on hard data. Measuring engagement will take the guesswork out of budget allocation. Engagement can drive awareness, transactions, brand preference, and loyalty. But each of these objectives requires a different approach and investment in people, processes, and technology.Marketing leaders from firms like CompUSA and BMW prioritized one goal, chose a very specific set of tools and vendors, and successfully moved the needle on transactions and loyalty, respectively.

Direct marketers and market researchers unearth deep client needs. Leading direct marketers already combine Web clicks with purchase and loyalty data to unearth a consumer's interaction with the brand. But BrandIntel went a step further and recorded the content that users generated and other consumers read.

eCommerce professionals drive online sales with personalization. More than a third of Web visitors will make a purchase after seeing a personalized recommendation. eCommerce professionals can boost online sales with one-to-one personalization.

Customer experience professionals innovate the brand. Whirlpool observed people at home and used the results to develop a new sub-brand -- Gladiator -- with fridges for men in their garages.To meet these uncovered needs, customer experience professionals will develop a disruptive strategy, simplifying the interaction, amplifying the service elements, and repositioning the brand overall.

My view:  Involvement, Interaction, Intimacy & Influence - 4Is as Forrester calls it, needs to be measured by marketers on a regular basis. This will increasingly make marketing more data-led. They need to be building programs around the 4Is using data. It is important that they start fusing transactional data with web data - clicks, blogs, social networks etc. along with customer service data. This will increasingly give marketers a peek preview into how customers feel, think and talk about their products and personalize their marketing efforts basis the degree of engagement they have identified with these set of customers. 

Gartner CRM 2008 Summit

I was just going thro' some reports on the Gartner CRM 2008 summit. There are some highlights which I  saw was not new or earth-shattering but definitely makes a lot of sense to reinforce once more:

• Act on feedback, deploy changes and communicate actions to employees and customers - companies should view every contact with customers as an opportunity to deliver brand values and standardise on the business feedback management tool across the organisation and for all communication channels.
• Design processes from the outside in - most process redesign is done with the objective of improving operational efficiencies rather than to improve the customer experience; which requires the organisation to identify which processes matter most to customers then set about identifying what to improve: an outside-in approach.
• Act as one organisation to ensure consistency - the customer may interact with many parties as part of his or her business with a company. The challenge for the company is to ensure that information gleaned at one interaction is not forgotten in the next channel.
• Be open - organisations that want to improve the customer experience often become more open. Being more open may just mean opening up more channels or opening hours but it can mean much more. For example, some firms establish an environment where customers can support, promote, defend or refer their products and services through an online community.
• Personalise products and experiences - some personalisation options are simple, such as a website that enables customers to monogram products, while others are more complex, such as tailoring and personal pricing.
• Alter attitudes and employee behaviour - employees’ actions are often the most powerful improvements in a customer’s experience. Companies can alter employee behaviour in three primary ways: recruit the right types of employees, ensure standards such as policies, procedures and governance structures, and create training programmes and incentives that can modify employee behaviour patterns.
• Design the complete customer experience - many organisations have no plan or design for the customer experience. Companies with a focus on selling experiences focus on designing experiences. Customers of Disney, for instance, told it that difficulties in leaving the amusement parks often spoilt the experience, so the firm has worked to improve parking and traffic at its facilities.

My View:  The key question really though, is how do we enable all of this in organizations - to me it is about execution-employee focus. I think there is only a small mention on how do we reward, appraise and evaluate employees who should make this happen. This is really where the pieces begin to fall. There are conflicting KRAs in different departments and hence there are no compelling reasons to deliver a consistent customer experience. To put it bluntly, "if it does not hurt, it does not matter!"  This is where it needs to begin and end as the puzzles in the middle are put together!

Do you onboard your customers?

I am not always excited if somebody tells me I have acquired a new customer. I always look at what is in the plan of the marketing & product teams to make these customers use all the features and benefits of the product, so that these customers can be with them for life. Not too many companies pay attention to onboarding customers. They acquire and forget. Or they pay a lot of attention to how to acquire customers but not do enough review of what is done to keep and grow these customers. Kevin Zimmerman, Sr. Editor, at Peppers & Rogers writes:

Consumer electronics companies and retailers are finding out the hard way what happens when you don't educate customers. Take, for example, the recent situation involving the purchase of popular high-definition televisions (HDTVs). According to Forrester Research Analyst James McQuivey, 20 percent of the sets sold have been returned in some U.S. regions, in large part by consumers who didn't realize what they were buying. Per an ESPN/Knowledge Networks/Statistical Research Inc. study, only 64 percent of homes with an HDTV have HD programming via broadcast or cable, and 13 percent of people who own an HD set do not know if they receive an HD signal. McQuivey forecasts the 20 percent figure will drop moving forward, as more retailers see the need to educate customers about the format if they want to avoid such massive returns.

Who's responsible for customer education?

Henry Choy, senior analyst at Jon Peddie Research says ""The store should do a better job of educating customers, the documentation inside the box must be better, cable companies can get more involved,"..

For a moment, if we as marketers think like customers, then count the number of times we would have read an operating manual, the number times we would have used the features that we primarily bought the product for, the number of times a company that we bought the product from, called to tell you if you have understood the features and used them. In my case, it is close to zero. That's the opportunity waiting to be tapped - Onboard your customers and you will realize there's profits to be made for life.

Why developing customer relationship is so hard

Ron got my attention with a lovely post on this topic. He has some very thought-provoking points on various facets of building customer relationships. He picks-up a quote from John Gottman who says:

“Good relationships aren’t about clear communication — they’re about small moments of attachment and intimacy.”. He gives an example of  a 'small moment' that built a relationship with  a customer -

An IT executive traces his loyalty to USAA back to a single phone call. He called the firm to cancel a credit card and insurance policy. The rep said “I hope I’m not overstepping my boundaries, but we’ve found that many customer often cancel products because of events that aren’t related to USAA like a divorce or other family matter. We’ve set up a special department to help customers with these kinds of matters, is this something we might be able to help you with?” Since he was in the middle of the divorce, he took USAA up on that offer and has been a loyal customer since.

He further writes, Gottman also says that:

“Successful couples look for ways to accentuate the positive. They try to say ‘yes’ as often as possible.”

He writes - Gottman’s comment echoes my sentiment that building a relationship isn’t simply about saying “trust us” but saying (and demonstrating) “we trust you.”

How can one institutionalize this process? - My view:

Companies don't necessarily disagree with this philosophy but the truth is getting it working in the trenches(in the marketplace across channels) - that's always the challenge. Companies need to build a robust Customer Interaction Architecture (CIA) that can capture this "pain point' and 'enable' it with tools and triggers to make a difference. I certainly believe every  transaction or complaint or query is an opportunity to build a "Small Moment Customer Interaction Architecture (SMCIA)'.

To make this happen, there is a need to increasingly integrate technology with every marketing processes.

Forrester's ladder of participation and impact on marketing

I was reflecting over the weekend about Forrester's Social Technographics Ladder of Participation. While it was focussed on emerging social technologies, I felt there were some trends, learnings and practices that can be applied from here to refresh marketing thinking, practices, evolving needs to embrace technologies that can make some changes happen and thereby make marketing more relevant to enterprises and CEOs. Let's take a look at this Ladder of Participation first:

I see the marketing eco-system too, taking a very similar shape(with either customers or prospects) in the years to come. The need to 'engage' and run marketing campaigns across a similar ladder is bound to become increasingly important. Marketing will need to 'bucket' its segments of customers or prospects across the spectrum of Inactives to Creators. The 'old world marketing' practice would have stopped with collecters - who I would define as repeat purchasers. Normally, marketing practices would have stopped there.

But, in the 'new world of marketing', customers will be more involved, participative and conversational. Thereby, customers will leave a 'trail of information' behind, in enterprises. For an enterprise, the creators will be the most loyal and demanding. They need to be recognized, valued and encouraged to converse. The ones who do it, will become identifiable and the most important. Also, products/brands will have to become 'information platforms' in such a world. This will also lead to customized design of products and services for them.

The critics are the ones who will have to be 'listened' to. With emerging channels or touch points, the enterprises must open a channel of communication to hear and rectify their problems. They are the ones who can potentially move-up the ladder of participation.

The collectors need to be 'prodded' to talk rather just buy again and again, get them to share their experience and frustrations with the product. And the joiners will have to be moved to become collecters.

This kind of marketing will combine a lot of information, analytical insights, real-time marketing automation to talk to customers in different behavioural states and stages in the ladder. And when enterprises talk of millions and millions of such identified customers or prospects, the need for marketing to deliver scalable, real-time, right-time marketing will only become sacrosanct. The ones who will practice it, will have the ear of CEOs/CFOs and the rest will be left behind.

 

    

NYSE CEO Report 2008 - Focus on the customer

Frank Capek drew my attention to a recent report  on how customers & devoting signifcant executive time on managing customers will be central focus of CEOs during 2008 (Report)

From the executive summary:

”The first theme is that this may be a year in which there is renewed vigor around the customer - 2008 may be a year where many CEOs put the customer at the top of the long list of issues on which they must focus. Why?  Simply stated - customers are at the core of growth.  Here are a few points from this year’s study that are the foundation of this theme:

• CEOs are planning greater investment, both budget and time-wise, on customer relationship management.
• The importance of sales growth as a performance measure has increased since the prior study. Customers are the engine of sales growth.
• Brand, reputation, and investments in corporate social responsibility are more important this year - all efforts that are focused on the winning the hearts and minds of the customer.
• While many CEOs say it is easier to attract customers than it used to be, many, particularly outside the United States, say it is getting harder to retain customers. CEOs recognize that losing customers can be costly.”

Key take-out: It's heartening for me to note that managing customers will be on top of CEOs' agenda. To make it a reality,I think they will have to spend significant time in driving it down the organization - amongst their business heads and their ranks. This has always been a key challenge as there are a lot of issues regarding channel conflicts, change management, marketing budget allocation, linking performance incentives wrt customer management goals, technology investments, profit & cost allocation etc. that will need their focus, to drive this kind of a culture in an organization. Also, they will have to invest significantly in identifying metrics and measurement dashboards around how customers are being managed real time in an enterprise and drive this relentlessly across lifecycle of their customers over the next couple of years once they make a start in 2008.

 

Single view of customers across the enterprise gain attention

While there has been lot of discussions around the need for single view of customers across an enterprise over the last few years, 2008 seems to be a year when this trend could gain a lot of momentum.

Aberdeen Group surveyed over 250 companies to identify the strategies, capabilities and enablers that Best in Class (BIC) companies are using to improve sales and marketing alignment.

Some highlights from the report:

• Best in Class organizations plan to invest in analytics at 1.4-times the rate of the Industry average and 1.7-times the rate of laggards.
• The customer is the core of BIC companies' plans to alleviate the pressure of increasing top-line revenue. Eighty percent (80 percent) of the BIC grate lead qualification and measurement efforts between sales and marketing, compared to 55 percent of laggards. Further, 25 percent of the BIC are preparing to better meet customers' product configuration or personalization needs.
• BIC firms are developing processes around the customer's needs. As customer knowledge and expectations rise, the BIC are adapting. The BIC are 1.9 times more likely than laggards to formalize processes for generating customized proposals, and 1.4 times more likely than laggards to set standards for knowledge sharing between sales and marketing.
• Sixty percent of the BIC currently have cross-functional teams, with an additional 15 percent planning a change.Over one-third of laggards have no plans to implement cross-functional teams. Working side by side facilitates knowledge transfer and increases operational efficiencies. The BIC are also adding operations roles to support sales and marketing. Currently 40 percent of the BIC have these resources in place, and 75 percent of them plan to increase their investment in dedicated personnel next year.

To me it looks like many companies will be putting together a lot of plans around setting-up cross-functional, collaborative teams to enable customer-centricity in their organizations. Also, the need for technology to get a single view of a customer's journey across the enterprise  is becoming more important to extract value/ROI out of marketing investments they are making, is getting a lot of focus amongst CXOs.

What are the icons of your customer service?

If you are obsessed with customer-centricity in your organization, it make sense to have some icons that serves as a benchmark for the organization to emulate and live-up to. CRM Buyer has an interesting article on how Lands' End did it:

Motivation can take many forms. At Lands' End these days, it has taken the shape of a London taxicab parked in front of the company's headquarters, its black paint buffed to a mirror-like shine, its grille festooned with a Christmas wreath.

Historic Return Policy

Lands' End, now a division of Sears, has built a reputation for 44 years on customer service. The London taxi, returned by a customer in 2005, has become Lands' End's version of a well-known Nordstrom legend, in which a customer was allowed to return tires even though Nordstrom never sold tires.

However, in this case, Lands' End really did sell the car, back in 1984. The London taxi was featured on the cover of Lands' End's holiday catalog that year as a special luxury item. The cab, complete with a right-side steering wheel, and filled with classic English cashmere clothing and gifts, was sold for US$19,000 to a Kansas native. The woman bought it as a gift for her husband, who was a car collector.

In 2005, the man called Lands' End and invoked the company's unconditional guarantee policy that allows customers to return any item that they are not satisfied with for an exchange or refund of the full purchase price. He got the $19,000 back, and Lands' End got the car.

The taxi would be worth between $10,000 and $12,000 now, according to Richard Lentinello, editor of Hemmings Motor News, a monthly publication for car enthusiasts based in Vermont.

It's more than a cab. McCreight says the taxi is a valuable symbol.

"For thousands of employees, or new employees, to say, if you're designing a product, and you're going to need to stand behind that product 21 years later, how dearly and how much attention do you take to design it," McCreight(President of Lands' End) said.

I personally think this is a lovely quote from McCreight and one that is extremely relevant. Many companies develop products or policies, sell or run it for sometime, only to later revoke it! Companies need to realize that such revoked products or policies leave customers confused, frustrated and miffed. It pays to plan just in case your customer returns after 21 years!

Emerging Technology trends that will shape business and economic growth - McKinsey's perspective

Carleen Hawn has drawn-up a nice summary of McKinsey's article.

Technology alone is rarely the key to unlocking economic value: companies create real wealth when they combine technology with new ways of doing business. … we have identified eight technology-enabled trends that will help shape businesses and the economy in coming years. These trends fall within three broad areas of business activity: managing relationships, managing capital and assets, and leveraging information in new ways.

A. Managing relationships

1. Distributing cocreation

The Internet and related technologies … allow companies to delegate substantial control to outsiders—cocreation—in essence by outsourcing innovation to business partners that work together in networks. By distributing innovation through the value chain, companies may reduce their costs and usher new products to market faster by eliminating the bottlenecks that come with total control.

The Caution:
Companies pursuing this trend will have less control over innovation and the intellectual property that goes with it, however. They will also have to compete for the attention and time of the best and most capable contributors.

2. Using consumers as innovators

Consumers also cocreate with companies; the online encyclopedia Wikipedia, for instance… Companies that involve customers in design, testing, marketing (such as viral marketing), and the after-sales process get better insights into customer needs and behavior and may be able to cut the cost of acquiring customers, engender greater loyalty, and speed up development cycles.

The Caution:
But a company open to allowing customers to help it innovate must ensure that it isn’t unduly influenced by information gleaned from a vocal minority. It must also be wary of focusing on the immediate rather than longer-range needs of customers and be careful to avoid raising and then failing to meet their expectations.

3. Tapping into a world of talent

… Much as technology permits [companies] to decentralize innovation through networks or customers, it also allows them to parcel out more work to specialists, free agents, and talent networks…new talent-deployment models could emerge [and] changes in the nature of labor relationships could lead to new pricing models that would shift payment schemes from time and materials to compensation for results.

The Caution:
This trend should gather steam in sectors such as software, health care delivery, professional services, and real estate, where companies can easily segment work into discrete tasks for independent contractors and then reaggregate it … Competitive advantage will shift to companies that can master the art of breaking down and recomposing tasks.

4. Extracting more value from interactions

Companies have been automating or offshoring an increasing proportion of their production and manufacturing (transformational) activities and their clerical or simple rule-based (transactional) activities. As a result, a growing proportion of the labor force in developed economies engages primarily in work that involves negotiations and conversations, knowledge, judgment, and ad hoc collaboration—tacit interactions, as we call them. By 2015 we expect employment in jobs primarily involving such interactions to account for about 44 percent of total US employment, up from 40 percent today.

The Caution:
Tere is still substantial room for automating transactional activities, and the payoff can typically be realized much more quickly and measured much more clearly than the payoff from investments to make tacit work more effective. Creating the business case for investing in interactions will be challenging—but critical—for managers.

B. Managing capital and assets

5. Expanding automation

Companies, governments, and other organizations have put in place systems to automate tasks and processes [like] forecasting and supply chain technologies…. Now these systems are becoming interconnected through common standards for exchanging data and … this information can be combined in new ways to automate an increasing array of broader activities, from inventory management to customer service.

The Caution:
Automation is a good investment if it not only lowers costs but also helps users to get what they want more quickly and easily, though it may not be a good idea if it gives them unpleasant experiences. The trick is to strike the right balance between raising margins and making customers happy.

6. Unbundling production from delivery

Technology helps companies to utilize fixed assets more efficiently… Information and communications technologies handle the tracking and metering critical to the new models and make it possible to have effective allocation and capacity-planning systems. Amazon.com [has] expanded its business model to let other retailers use its logistics and distribution services [and] independent software developers … buy processing power on its IT infrastructure so that they don’t have to buy their own. Mobile virtual-network operators, another example of this trend, provide wireless services without investing in a network infrastructure.

The Caution:
Companies that make their assets available for internal and external use will need to manage conflicts if demand exceeds supply. A competitive advantage through scale may be hard to maintain when many players, large and small, have equal access to resources at low marginal costs.

C. Leveraging information

7. Putting more science into management

Technology is helping managers exploit ever-greater amounts of data to make smarter decisions and develop the insights that create competitive advantages and new business models. From “ideagoras” (eBay-like marketplaces for ideas) to predictive markets to performance-management approaches… Leading players are exploiting this information explosion with a diverse set of management techniques. Google fosters innovation through an internal market: employees submit ideas, and other employees decide if an idea is worth pursuing or if they would be willing to work on it full-time.

The Caution:
Leaders should get out ahead of this trend to ensure that information makes organizations more rather than less effective. Information is often power; broadening access and increasing transparency will inevitably influence organizational politics and power structures. Environments that celebrate making choices on a factual basis must beware of analysis paralysis.

8. Making businesses from information

Accumulated pools of data captured in a number of systems within large organizations or pulled together from many points of origin on the Web are the raw material for new information-based business opportunities… market imperfections include[ing] information asymmetries and the frequent inability of decision makers to get all the relevant data … allow middlemen and players with more and better information to extract higher [prices] by aggregating and creating businesses around it.

The Caution:
But that sword can cut both ways; today’s aggregators, for instance, may themselves be aggregated tomorrow. Companies relying on information-based market imperfections need to assess the impact of the new transparency levels that are continually opening up in today’s information economy.

The difference between CRM and CEM

Lauren Hoyt, Editor, SearchCRM provides some great perspective on the difference between CRM and CEM( Customer Experience Management):

First there's the question of a definition. I asked Lior Arussy, one of the thought leaders in this arena, to define customer experience management.

According to Lior, a customer experience is the total value proposition provided to a customer, including the actual product and all pre- and post-sales interactions with the customer. Meanwhile, CEM is the science and art of managing all interactions with customers across all touch points in order to maximize the value provided to customers.

"There are quite a few differences between [CRM and CEM]," Martha said. "If we look at CRM, that's how a customer looks to a company. And if we think about CEM, that's really how the company looks to the customer ...we're talking about making it worthwhile to do more business with us because we become more worthwhile to them. It's taking the time to see their point of view, understanding how to be reciprocal with them, understanding how to be trustworthy."

"CEM systems and CRM systems serve different, although complementary, purposes," he said. "While CEM is about creating the best customer experience, CRM is about managing relationships while focusing on maximizing revenues. CRM is tools geared to manage and analyze customer information, while CEM is tools geared to enable and enhance customer interactions."

Managing the multi-channel paradox in retail banking

Frost & Sullivan has released a report on managing the multi-channel challenges that retail banking is faced with today. According to the report, multi-channel banking has increased the potential for diminshed sales opportunities despite the expanded number of distribution channels!

The report says:

"...the number of bank channels and touch points have proliferated and so has the complexity of the service delivery which has added to the overall cost structure. Rather than lowering the overhead, the greater number of touch points actually prompted customers to increase their transactions - resulting in higher overall costs...."

Some of the best practice recommended are:

1. Meet and exceed the needs of the high value customers - Find ways to creatively service the needs of these customers.
2. Provide "consistent" quality of multi-channel  experience - Don't create a fragmented feel of interactions across multiple-channels.Create an organization-wide customer experience strategy.
3. Integrate across channels.
4. Provide action-oriented intelligence - Integrated data can provide proactive customer interaction measures.
5. Employ Event-based selling

I believe the key point here is getting different silos of retail banks to work together with a common customer experience strategy across mutiple product offerings, agreed metrics around different channels( for acquisition, retention, cross-sell and customer service issues) and drawing-up proper handshake processes between channels when customers interact with banks.

Getting your customer data or information in order

Businesses today talk about CRM, Customer experience etc. but  I think there is a need for companies to get down to basics and get their house in order in terms of how they store & update customer information - more precisely, the quality of the information they hold. Louise Druce writes:

Businesses are built on data but it can be a rocky foundation if you don’t look after it. Even something as simple as getting a customer’s name wrong could have massive implications further down the line, such as affecting billing, product tracking and all-important customer loyalty.

Sorting dirty data

Ownership was traditionaly something left to the IT department. But in recent years firms have come to realise that IT staff don’t necessarily understand the elements that make good data ‘fit for purpose’, according to Colin Rickard, managing director EMEA, at data quality specialist DataFlux.

“If you are working on a customer data project, an IT manager is not in the position to understand how a marketing data record should be organised or the values it must contain,” he points out. “It is important for the business user to be involved in the process.”

"It’s not just about technology. It’s about having a strong culture for data quality in place,” adds Wrazen. “In some ways, that’s the hardest part because no one wants to own it. It’s quite a complex process to build into an organisation and infrastructure – it’s cross-platform, cross-technology and cross-business discipline as well.”

I can't agree with this more. Somebody in the organization has to get into the act of plumbing it right. Else, it will always lead to poor information decisions about an organization's customers.

Secrets to building a customer-centric organization - # 2

When it's Disney, you know there is more passion behind the company than just some products, characters or merchandize! No wonder, it shows in the customer experience.

Read some Disney quotes and understand the passion behind the man and his ideas:

“Disneyland is a work of love. We didn’t go into Disneyland just with the idea of making money.”

“When we opened Disneyland, a lot of people got the impression that it was a get-rich thing, but they didn’t realize that behind Disneyland was this great organization that I built here at the Studio, and they all got into it and we were doing it because we loved to do it.”

“Disneyland is like a piece of clay, if there is something I don’t like, I’m not stuck with it. I can reshape and revamp.”

“The idea of Disneyland is a simple one. It will be a place for people to find happiness and knowledge. It will be a place for parents and children to share pleasant times in one another’s company; a place for teachers and pupils to discover greater ways of understanding and education. Here the older generation can recapture the nostalgia of days gone by, and the younger generation can savor the challenge of the future.

“To make the dreams of Disneyland come true took the combined skills and talents of hundreds of artisans, carpenters, engineers, scientists and craftsmen. The dream that they built now become your heritage. It is you who will make Disneyland truly a magic kingdom and a happy place for millions of guests who will visit us now and in the future.”

Read more

Is it customer or consumer?

The word customer and consumer is used interchangeably today.What's right? Should we, as marketing folks, understand where to use customer or consumer? Susan has some interesting take on this:

My real problem was that I'd crossed over from a world where the buyers of your services have individual names (financial services), to a world where the buyers of your goods are largely a nameless mass (most consumer products).

What's the difference between a product and a service, really?

Here's a nice definition for a service:

"Any act or performance offered that is essentially intangible and does not result in ownership of any thing"    - Prof. Brian Engelland, MSU

You are dealing with a service when...

[1] Production and consumption are hard to separate. Examples: travel, investments

[2] Intangibles form a large part of what is being purchased. Examples: insurance, consulting

[3] There is no change of ownership. Customers typically rent a service, rather than owning it. Examples: credit card or loan, hotel room

[4] A sale that does not happen today cannot be recovered in the future. Examples: empty seats in a theatre, lost interest on a mortgage

[5] Customers must evaluate the purchase decision with few tangibles to go on. Examples: health care

[6] Output quality is variable, and depends on the performance of individuals. Examples: Hair styling, interior decorating, surgery

[7] Manner of dress, body language, and expressed language form part of the brand experience.  Examples: air travel, retail banking

[8] Cycle of purchase is repeated through 'rental payments'. There is no smooth movement through a consumption cycle, and there are frequent 'moments of truth'.  Examples: health club membership, anti-virus software rental, weight-loss groups

[9] Employees behavior and knowledge is central to delivery and quality. Examples: financial planning

[10] The memories of the experience may be as important as the experience itself. Examples: vacation travel, theme parks

[11] There are high degrees of customer contact during production. Examples: health care, spa services

[12] Competing offerings may differ in how much of the work of production is shifted to the buyer.  Examples: online brokerage vs. full service, self-serve vs. full service gas station

[13] Suppliers assume real economic risks (exceeding the revenue potential) by choosing a given customer. Some interested customers must be rejected. Examples: credit cards, insurance, auditing

[14] Customers assume real economic risks (exceeding the fee paid for the service) by choosing a given supplier. Examples: mutual funds, home insurance

[15] Everyone calls them clients, users or customers, rather than consumers

So now you know. There you have it. Try to keep your customers and your consumers straight now, okay?

Secrets to building a customer-centric organization - # 1

I have been coming across some interesting quotes (which resonate a lot & appeal to me) as building blocks towards creating a customer-centric organization. There is no one formula but I thought I will blog about them (as and when I find them), aggregate them here so as to serve as a resource for all. Here's the first!

Poor Customer Experience - Is it a marketing or IT issue?

I have always believed bad customer experience with a company is primarily due to lack of alignment/ synergy with various departments involved in delivering value or service to the customer. When the departments' objectives are not aligned and if they don't work together closely, superior customer experience can never become a reality. In this era of all pervasive technology across the enterprise, increasingly marketing and IT must talk and work with each other to make this happen. CIO Magazine has a nice article on this topic:

Indeed, every time you see significant dysfunction in the way a company or brand interacts with its customers, it is not the fault of one corporate function but two—both marketing and technology. The combination of people and technology deployed across multiple service channels fails to provide the basic services you sought, let alone the world class services you expected.

So when will CIOs and CMOs join forces to address these challenges, not from their well-defended functional silos but together? The answer: when both parties take time to fully understand and account for the impact their solutions will have on the consumer.

It’s Not What You Sell, It’s How You Sell It

When corporations grow to mass market proportions, their scale alone creates complexity that requires one or more presentation layers. Indeed, without integrating a corporation’s touch points into an appropriately configured presentation layer, a company’s offerings (its brands, products and services) and its operations (its people, organisation and processes) can behave in ways that make little sense to customers and present a corporate “face” that’s wildly inconsistent from one customer encounter to the next. Such conditions can also create opaque, unresponsive or simply uncaring corporate behaviors, which don’t align with the intent of most corporate brands.

It’s the art of interaction that makes the difference between great brands that transcend the fate of individual product or service offerings (Nike, Starbucks, or Lexus), and those that live and die based on the often short-term viability of what they have to sell (Reebok, Burger King, or General Motors). It’s a new frontier of competition, and winning requires integrated marketing and IT savvy.

Restructuring the CIO-CMO Relationship

The strategic dialogue between CIO and CMO must begin with consensus as to the desired customer experience and brand. Often these conversations are best guided by an outside facilitator with objective hearing and broad industry context. This probing can highlight impediments of the company’s organisational structure and governance, management incentives, and enterprise economics. Together, the CIO and CMO must know the customer perspective on these issues:-

• Have we deployed the right touch points (human and technology) in the right places in the right ways—and do we have we too many or too few?
• Have we optimised each of our touch points according to customers’ preferences and needs, by customer segment and usage occasion?
• Have we understood the processes or pathways our customers select to interact with our company in each and every purchase or re-purchase cycle?
• Have we aligned and integrated those touch points (along with the people, processes and systems that enable them) into consistent and coordinated expressions of brand and offerings to deliver coherent customer experiences?

Attn: CEO - Great marketing + Great Technology is the only way forward

George F.Colony CEO, Forrester, has written a brilliant paper on how technology has broken down the barriers that existed between companies and customers. In an era where the 30-sec TV Spot and newspaper ads are dying, over the last couple of years, I too have come to firmly believe that marketing and technology departments in companies have to come together and work closely, if companies want to build truly tangible value for their customers. 

George goes on to explain how CEOs need to pay attention to this increasingly:

• Marketing and technology in your company must work together to design and implement your Web 2.0 strategy. And you, and only you, can get the dogs and cats to interbreed. It's an unnatural act, but one that must occur before your company can become an opportunist, rather than a victim, in the world of Web 2.0.
• You may try to restrict your digital content through laws, rules, digital rights management, and/or security systems. The cold reality remains that customers, citizens, consumers want what they want, regardless of how you may try to restrict them. They see the power of digital and its inherent flexibility.
• You've got to earn the respect and allegiance of your customers every day — both of which can wither with unparalleled speed (see Dell and the flaming batteries, circa 2006).
• Get your marketers to throw out those 30-question customer surveys and focus on one question: "Would you recommend this product or service to a friend or colleague?"
• After eight years of evaluating more than 1,000 large corporate Web sites, Forrester found only 3% with passing grades. The vast majority are hard to use, confusing, poorly designed, and cast an unfavorable shadow over the brand.
• It's now a two-way conversation. Listen, respond, and talk intelligently. Stop dictating to customers. It's your customers, not you, that have the power.

Lovely stuff and worth putting into action rightaway!

Know the value of your customers

Geoffery Colvin has written a book Angel Customers and Demon Customers. He has some nice point of view on these kinds of customers:

In our experience across a wide range of industries, companies typically find that the best 20 percent of their customers account for 150 percent of total profits! The worst 20 percent typically lose money equal to 75 percent of profits, while the remaining 60 percent of customers account for the rest. Knowing which customers are angels and which are demons presents an enormous opportunity.

Once you know the true profitability of your customers, you can figure out the reasons behind the numbers. For your unprofitable customers, you'll have to face the reality that you're not offering them a compelling value proposition - a way of meeting their needs so well that they'll reward you with handsome profitability. You'll have to devise new, better, value propositions for them, which our experience shows you can probably do. As a result, you'll start to turn those unprofitable customers into profitable ones, which typically creates a substantial swing in the business's overall profitability.

In the end, you may find that a small percentage of customers just cannot be made profitable. By the time you've figured out who they are, you'll understand very well why they probably aren't worth keeping.”

Have you found yours?

Thro' Brand Autopsy

Toxic employees and customer management

Seth Godin provides an interesting perspective on toxic employees and how they manage customers:

Toxic employees are the ones that have difficulty with their co-workers, or worse, far worse, with your customers.They make two big confusions:

• They confuse "How can I help this prospect/customer?" with "How can I get rid of this person and get back to work?"
• They confuse, "How can I have a better day by treating this person with a great deal of respect?" with "Why isn't this person treating me with the respect I deserve?"

Managers can hire the non-toxic, re-assign the toxic and be really clear with themselves that they're willing to pay almost any price to keep toxic employees away from everyone else. And if toxic employees appears to be a pattern, my bet is that it's your fault, not the employees.

Landline Vs Landless marketing thinking

Shlomi Ron has a thought-provoking article on how telco marketers' mindsets have to change in an increasingly landless telephony world.

The land-line school of thought is characterized by a localized connectivity that "chains down" device users to one place -- at a point of access -- and demands multiple charges per connection and content consumption.

In contradiction, the landless school of thought preaches convergence, or full ubiquitivity (ubiquity+connectivity): the freedom to access information using multiple devices (e.g., desktop, laptop, cellphone, PDA, videogame consoles, et cetera) anytime, anywhere without complex and multiple fee schedules.

In terms of communication, land-line thinking is typically manifested with wireless carriers that charge for voice communication, text and data services and web services separately, with additional fees for each additional family member using the service. A landless business model would factor the cost of content into the cost of the access device, thus providing consumers with unlimited access to a Universal Content Country, supported by myriad content providers.

Today marketers are faced with two distinct challenges: delivery and content. Think about land-line delivery as a physical faucet: water (content) is gushing through at pre-designated locations, and the faucet makers control both the access and quality of water. Well, consumers are starting to demand the ability to carry their own glasses and drink their smart water on the go and on their own terms. Let's make sure we are still looked upon as a reservoir where users can fill those glasses, when and where they want to. 

Succeeding in the information economy

Cory Doctorow writes:

An "information economy" can't be based on selling information. The information economy is about selling everything except information.

When you create products, experiences or services around information that you have or ones you collect continously, I presume new business models get built.

• So when we think of new products, we must ensure we don't just create dumb products, the value of it diminishes very quickly. Envelope information around  so it gets enriched continously to create value.
• Having just valuable information is no good. The information could be content, behaviroural knowledge etc. It is valuable only when it becomes relevant in a context.
• Convert information into indelible experiences