Customer World

Transforming marketing data to enable decision management

Here's an interesting presentation my Jamet on using marketing data for decision management. Take a look:

| View | Upload your own

Consistent customer experience is about organizing information

Marty  Mosely, in her expert opinion in Peppers & Rogers  writes about the importance of organizing customer information.

Master Data Management (MDM) software or systems enable organizations to strategically leverage and share those critical data assets. Deployed properly, MDM can provide organizations with complete, accurate, and real-time views of data spread across multiple systems or databases, even outside the firewall. This allows businesses to unlock the value of their data assets for competitive advantages or operational improvements.

Exactly how are businesses using MDM? Here are some quick, real-world examples of how organizations in the hospitality, retail, and technology industries are using MDM solutions to manage their most important data while adding to the company bottom line.

Increasing customer recognition and loyalty

Although an international hotel chain was using multiple systems to track guests, the company was only able to follow those enrolled in its loyalty program—about 10 percent of its customer base. This meant the company was potentially under-servicing 70 percent of frequent guests who did not have a loyalty program number. With mountains of complicated data from multiple systems, representing 5,000 global properties across eight brands, getting a handle on the data was a daunting task.

The company chose an MDM system that aggregated complex customer data without disrupting source systems, and seamlessly integrated with its loyalty program system. Once the MDM system was deployed, it was no longer a problem to identify frequent guests, even if they registered under different identities (variations on names and addresses without a consistent identifier), did not use their loyalty program number, or stayed at a number of the company's brands for a variety of reasons. By accurately matching guest information according to demographic and historical information, the company is now able to recognize guests across all brands in its portfolio in real time at the point of service.

Improving customer experience and top-line growth

Plagued by redundant records and an inability to properly recognize customers at any touchpoint, a massive retailer with a huge online presence and hundreds of brick and mortar stores knew it was essential to get a grip on customer data to help the company interact with customers in a more meaningful way. With its new MDM system in place, the retailer has created an accurate, real-time view of its approximately 40 million customer records from three disparate data sources. It can now recognize individual and household relationships, and has identified more than 11 million redundant records.

The retailer can now provide a complete view of transaction and customer history at the point of interaction, fulfill online orders at physical stores, better reconcile customer preferences, eliminate duplicate and inconsistent marketing campaigns, and remove the need to repeatedly ask customer loyalty program members for their personal information.

Understanding customer relationships and improving revenue and service

One of the world's largest technology companies was losing significant revenue due to incomplete software licensing information and territory assignment issues. The company needed to access composite views of all individual and organization data about customers, partners, and suppliers along with advanced B2B hierarchy management. The company used an MDM system to create a single view of customer and hierarchical data to help the organization address its licensing problems and operational inefficiencies, define the true and total value of every customer, identify the most valuable customers within an organization, and even know when a customer purchased through multiple channels.

The results were enormous. By properly managing organizational-level data, the company has found $139 million in new licensing revenue and recouped $47 million in operational cost savings. The MDM solution also helped improve field productivity since sales reps now can access synchronized data from across the entire organization (CRM, software licensing, and financial accounting applications) and gain a better picture of existing relationships and potential for cross- and upsell opportunities.

At the end of the day, what you sell or service doesn't matter. It is imperative to better understand your customers while improving the bottom line. With an MDM solution in place, it turns out that these two goals do not have to be mutually exclusive. Knowing your customers is the key.

My take: I  certainly think organizing customer information is the first step towards building consistent customer experience. This is the basic platform around which the rest of the customer marketing initiatives like segmentation, understanding customer value & profitability, analytics need to be built. Hence, getting this right is an important first step.

Preparing for a world when customer transactional behaviour changes!

The way customers pay and transact is undergoing a huge change. Today, most financial institutions have a trail of the payments, spends or usage in their transactional systems thro' many traditional payment methods. But, as these trends below show, there is a huge new revolution underway. If you are in the business of customer data & insight mining or in marketing to these customers, then get ready for paradigm shift in tracking & influencing their purchases.( Thanks David for this post)

Take a look at the trends:

1. Digital money
According to AC Nielsen, 90% of transactions in the US will be cashless by the year 2020. PayPal already has 63 million accounts, which makes it larger than most national banks,while in Korea during the month of June 2004, 300,000 people purchased cellphones into which you can insert a memory card containing all your financial data. So will physical money soon be a thing of the past? Most observers say yes, but don’t underestimate the power of human nature and tradition.

2. Contactless payment
McDonald’s is testing ‘contactless’ payment technologies in the US (and elsewhere). Just drive-in, grab your goods and drive off. Payment is made automatically by a wireless device on your windscreen linked to your bank account. Mobile phones can and will do much the same thing.

3. Pre-pay and stored value cards
10 million households in the US don’t have bank accounts and many of these use their pay cheques to buy pre-paid credit cards. Around 8.5% of households without bank accounts own pre-paid credit cards but this figure is expected to rise to 25% by the end of 2006. This is one reason why companies like Visa and MasterCard are getting into the act by signing up Rap moguls and singers like Russell Simmons and Usher to put their names on prepaid cards.

4. Private currencies
Pre-pay is a type of private currency in that you can restrict where people spend their money, in some cases to a single brand, outlet or service. This is good news for loyalty and also good (or bad) news for privacy depending on your point of view. For example, parents can give their children pre-paid cards with certain categories or locations locked off. However, the big news in private currencies is what’s happening in the air and in cyberspace. According to the Economist magazine, airmiles are now technically more valuable than the US dollar while over in cyberspace gamers are exchanging cyber dollars for the real thing.

5. Debt
The level of credit card debt in Britain has increased by 73% since 1997. The UK now holds 60% of all credit cards issued in Europe and has 75% of all European credit card debt. Spending on credit cards now represents 11% of GDP and 40% of people say they expect to use their cards more with the advent of new technology. Meanwhile, the amount owed to credit card companies in the UK now stands at GBP £53 billion. Figures for other countries such as the US and Australia are following a broadly similar trend. So what happens if (when) interest rates really go up? Trouble, that’s what.

6. Everyone is a bank
If everyone from supermarkets and search engines to phone companies and airlines offer banking services where does this leave the banks? The answer could be as back office low margin sub-contractors or maybe banks will re-frame themselves as ‘wealthcare’ businesses.

7. Micropayments
Once upon a time people used credit cards for big purchases like holidays. Not any more. Now you can buy a 99cent song on i-Tunes with your credit card or charge your hamburger at McDonald’s to your plastic. In 2004 the average credit card transaction in the US was $67.81. Back in 1999 it was $72.83. Add to this the possibilities created by contactless payment, stored value cards and pre-pay and you have a recipe for radical change in the financial services sector.

8. Proof of identity
With cases of identity theft going through the roof in most countries, there will be a boom for companies and technologies offering electronic and other forms of identity verification. There will also be an increase in products and services aimed at helping people get their identify back after its been stolen.

9. Mobile phones becoming wallets
Have you noticed how fewer people are wearing watches these days? Under the age of 21 a watch is almost a novelty as people use their mobile phones to tell the time instead. And so, the theory goes, phones will replace wallets too as people find it more convenient to carry their cash digitally inside their phones.

10. The death of cheques
  Seriously, who under the age of thirty uses cheques these days?

Learning from Clive Dunhumby

Independent has a nice article about Clive Dunbumby, a pioneer in data-led marketing. His involvement in the success of Tesco's loyalty program is legendary.Here's a chance to learn from his experience on how to use data:

If knowledge is power then Dunhumby founder Clive Humby is a very powerful man indeed. Every year, the Londoner's data mining firm peers into a mind-boggling 100 million shopping baskets. The contents of those baskets are sorted by codes, fed seamlessly into powerful spreadsheets and analysed by a team of dedicated number crunchers.By the end, Dunhumby has an eerily complete picture of individual shoppers.

• "If you want to have a dialogue with customers, you have to have permission," says Humby, "we have permission".

• Humby says responses to tailored vouchers are far more positive than reactions to mass market campaigns, which ultimately means better value for customers.

• "Voucher redemption (for tailored messages) is 20 to 30pc -- mind-numbingly high," he says. "If something relevant is sent to customers, they're much more likely to use it.

• "Tesco without Clubcard is unimaginable," he says. "The loyalty data is such a valuable set of insights that it's used with a light touch everywhere.""

• Promotions on coffee don't work because people tend to be loyal to one brand, while beer promotions are a winner because shoppers are happy to try many varieties.

• Tesco's "Supplier Insight" programme is largely used as a bargaining tool, with the supermarket giant offering "blue data" to suppliers tracing general trends with no personal information, but Tesco also uses the scheme to encourage promotions for frequently overlooked customers like older age groups, in a nod to social responsibility.

• Humby stresses that while data mining works well in "high transaction businesses", it will never hold the key to retailing success."If you're stores aren't right, if you haven't got the prices right, then people won't shop," he says, "You can't exploit a loyalty card without the fundamentals."

My take: When you have data, you should first know what does it have as information & how to use it.Don't collect data that you don't know where you are going to use. You should also know what works & does not work - measure & understand everything that you do. Lastly, you should know it is not a magic wand for you to get customers to come back or buy more. You have to get your product right.

Future Corporations - A world without HQs. Only HUBs

C.K. Prahalad and Hrishi Bhattacharyya write about a new world order that is transforming corporations:

Growth prospects for multinational corporations (MNCs) are expanding enormously. In Asia, Latin America, Africa, and Eastern Europe, there are more than 4 billion new potential customers whose rising incomes and aspirations have created an unprecedented market for all manner of goods and services. They want to own homes, to eat nutritious food, and to have varied entertainment options. They want toothpaste, cell phones, and motorcycles. To cater to these needs, business-to-business enterprises will be called upon to provide chemicals, cement, machine tools, electricity, and much more.

Many corporate leaders recognize this opportunity, but few are developing the capabilities or the management focus that they will need to realize its full potential. They persist in thinking of these new markets as “emerging markets,” separate from their existing customers in the industrialized world. Many companies have not reorganized their operations to serve a fully global economy.

Currently, most companies attempt to “go global” in one of two ways: centralization or decentralization.The gateway–hub structure represents a third alternative: a hybrid that reduces the tension between global integration and local responsiveness. Corporate leaders who are based in business unit–style organizations in selected gateway countries have a natural base from which to extend their footprint into nearby markets.Together, the 20 gateway countries — 10 from the industrialized world and 10 from emerging markets — account for about 80 percent of the world’s economic activity, and 70 percent of its 6.6 billion inhabitants. An MNC could most effectively expand its operations around the world by making it a priority to set up hubs in these gateway nations.

A gateway–hub structure can be flexible. A Chinese hub could manufacture goods for Greater China, other Asian markets, the Middle East, Europe, and the U.S. Conversely, a vibrant consumer market need not depend on a single hub: A hub in the U.S. could draw in goods from Brazil, China, and Mexico. All the hubs would probably be involved in manufacturing, but only some might incorporate research and development.

I personally think, we need to use markets/countries (effectively basis their strengths) that can add competitive advantage to various functions to an organization and get them to work in a networked manner. The challenge is to move these processes seamlessly across countries and that is what will make or break this structure.

The emerging BIG switch

I was reading an article in DM Review, on the emerging applications of business intelligence tools and the transformation expected in the future as 'information inventory' in enterprises gather pace over the next decade. While there are interesting trends on how BI applications will grow( which I have put together as a presentation), I would likely to slightly digress a bit and pick-out some thought-provoking points that has been made in the article:

I found a particularly interesting point that can have a profund impact on many business models which many business managers tend to dismiss or miss many a times:

"This is the trend that Nicholas Carr identifies in his book “The Big Switch: Rewiring the World, from Edison to Google” (W.W. Norton & Co., 2008). This refers to the trend of businesses switching from the internal deployment of software to the outsourcing of large-scale information processing systems, also known as software as a service (SaaS).SaaS is normally thought of as a simplification and economization of the installation, management and maintenance of software.

Carr’s argument is simple: during the industrial revolution, every factory had its own power plant – initially, water wheels and subsequently steam engines. As electrical service became widely available, a big switch took place, and as we know, few factories today have their own power plants because it became more economical for them to use electrical power supplied by utility companies. Carr’s point is that in a similar fashion today, most industries operate their own computer systems but soon will switch to having them managed by outside parties because it is more economical."

How's the BIG switch going to affect your business?

Is it possible for you to envision the big switch in your business that can become a game changer? I personally think this is happening to the so called analytical and marketing applications that I work with everyday. It's increasingly all about finding common business issues across business verticals, developing a common methodology to develop insights, identifying a platform to capture trends that the enterprise business users can access and getting them together quickly to create business impact. We need to have the ability to combine mass customization with scalability in our analytical marketing business.Am sure it's applicable to your business too!

THE BIG switch in BI applications

Coming back to the topic where I started,the article goes on to mention that Diagonal BI applications will substantially extend the benefits of SaaS and will accelerate the outsourcing trend in BI.

| View | Upload your own

Customer conversations in a world without identities

I recently read a very thought provoking article by Alec - " Hankering for a world without identity or federation". Also, a lovely follow-up article on the same topic by Andriana. Also, there's a nice comment by Christopher Carfi on the same topic.

These articles raised serious questions in my mind about how marketers, in the future, will have to build conversations with customers without identity. The key issue raised in my head was - increasingly as more and more get customers get online or mobile( in developing markets like India, China and the like) they would like to control their identity & conversations with brands. I presume things like DNPC( Do Not Place Cookies), DNL( Do not link ads(without permission)), DNT(Do Not tag along - SMSs )etc. will increasingly gain importance.

At the same time , these mediums are also being used for transactions and  purchases more and more. Many of these articles talk about protecting identity but when you combine identity with transactional information, interests in various social networks,memberships in certain sites etc.- it provides a new dimension in building conversations  with customers.Marketers will need to use data from multiple sources -in real time- to understand customers, get into their inner circle by really being valuable to their lives not just providing or sending a marketing messages. Also, identities need to be confirmed from multiple sources of paths from where customers come. There is a nice diagram from Adriana that I have picked-up which brings this point alive:
.

The key challenges and the winners of tomorrow will be the ones who are able to build conversations without identities. 

Personal recommendations are more authentic

As many channels start to converge, the chatter among customers about products, benefits, uses, problems, referrals is increasingly gaining a lot of attention. It's so easy  today to get on to the web and know what customers think about your products. The ability to fuse this data along with your transactional & attitudinal data that lies within your organization and doing analytics on this information is going to be the next inflection point for marketers.

Here's a presentation by Paul Isackson that brings out the power of this chatter and influence on customer behaviour.

| View | Upload your own

Inside Steve's Brain- customer-centric design thinking

Here's an overview of the new book that's just got released - Inside Steve's brain ( Nishad sent this to me a few hours ago). Personally, it tells me a lot about the way the man is thinking, pushing( the people around him), acting-on( his instincts) and executing( without being worried about what the world thinks about him). Customer-centric enterprises need to have customer-centric design thinking - the way their products need to be conceived, designed and delivered. Steve just does it with impeccable perfection and style.    Here's the preview before you rush-out to buy:

| View | Upload your own

Lead management - Involve before you start!

A recent study from the Sales Lead Management Association (SLMA)  shows that many companies are ignoring their sales lead management.

Their 2nd annual Sales Lead Management Study, conducted with 144 businesses in Southern California, revealed the following results:

• 68.8% don’t qualify leads before sending them to their sales teams
• 52.4% have no formal process for compiling sales forecast reports
• 82.8% don’t track ROI for lead generation investments
• 55% rated low satisfaction with their SFA/CRM system, at 5 or less on a 10-point scale
• 52.1% use no SFA/CRM system to track the lead process

My View:  The gap between sales & marketing departments has only grown over the years.Sales has had a siloed process in enterprises and in my experience getting sales to see & appreciate good quality leads is always big problem. On the other hand, I have always found, lack of understanding what a good lead is the problem of most lead generation programs. Often there is a mix of science, logic and an intuitive feeling in the salesperson's mind which a software or a process cannot replicate. But, my belief is that right at the inception of a lead generation program, you need to have the buy-in of the sales team. The lead generation team must be 'considered' a part of the sales team and may be that's the reason there's a term coined as 'inside sales'! Nevertheless, the lead generation team, the software and the process must be seamlessly integrated to succeed. It has to start before the program is implemented and announced. That's the key to its success.

CMO council releases study on 'Leveraging Customer Data and Analytics'

Only 50 percent of global marketers report having a strategy for further penetrating or monetizing key account relationships, reports the Chief Marketing Officer (CMO) Council in a new research study, Business Gain From How You Retain . In addition, a surprising 45 percent rate the effectiveness of customer relationship management (CRM) systems as deficient or needing more work, with only 15 percent of companies rating themselves extremely good or effective at integrating disparate customer data sources and repositories.

 

Conducted in late 2007 and early 2008, the CMO Council's Business Gain from How You Retain study undertook a wide-ranging evaluation of where and how marketers are "operationalizing" customer intelligence and insight to reduce customer churn, increase lifetime value, improve the customer experience, and increase the effectiveness and targeting of marketing spend.

More importantly, marketers are struggling to gain a true and timely view of the customer due to inadequate or incompatible IT systems and databases, siloed data in functional areas, and a limited strategic focus or management mandate on Customer Data Integration (CDI). Compounding the issue is a lack of formalized data-sharing policies and practices in the organization, combined with internal political or cultural barriers and IT obstacles and objections to data integration.

 

"We are seeing a fundamental need for marketers to be more effective at tapping the valuable vein of customer data that runs deep inside all organizations," notes Donovan Neale-May, Executive Director of the CMO Council. "Investing in integrated systems that harvest customer insight is critical to driving both marketing and business performance," he adds.

•       Only 15 percent of marketers say their companies are doing an extremely good or effective job of integrating disparate customer data sources and repositories; 55 percent note there is room for improvement or a deficiency in this area.
•      More than 31 percent of companies surveyed had customer churn rates of more than 10 percent and 32 percent reported turnover of five to 10 percent. In comparison, more than 62 percent said they desired or expected a churn level of less than five percent.
•      Respondents believe customer churn significantly impacts business performance through revenue loss (59.9 percent), reduced profitability (39.6 percent) and greater marketing and re-acquisition costs (36.3 percent). 
  
•      While churn is a big issue, nearly 67 percent of those surveyed say they have no system for re-activating dormant or lost customers, while just over half of respondents have a strategy for further penetrating or monetizing key account relationships.

•       While more than 35 percent of respondents report that the CMO or marketing department (38.9 percent) has primary responsibility for the customer analytics function, they are not leveraging its value. Over 31 percent of those surveyed do no data mining at all and 63 percent are only doing moderate levels of data mining for intelligence and insight.

•             The top six strategic applications of customer information by marketers include:

                        - Up-selling and cross-selling
                        - Segmenting and targeting
                        - Driving retention, loyalty and promotional programs
                        - Identifying new opportunities and unmet needs
                        - Improving customer service
                        - Shaping personalized and customized communications

•      Key initiatives to increase customer retention include improving customer communications (65.2 percent); addressing complaints, problems and pain points (51.8 percent); and enhancing the customer experience (54.8 percent). Unfortunately, fewer marketers noted their companies' willingness to modify business practices and policies to accommodate customer needs.

The laws of physics behind marketing methods

I read an interesting post about how the rules of mass marketing, direct marketing & social media are so different in approach, content, analysis and results. Therefore, for marketers, the challenge of applying & measuring each of them is conflicting, different & downright confusing. The truth though is that data(at an individual customer level) is becoming the DNA for marketing and incremental byte-sized data from each of them come at different points of time - controlled to near-real to real.The key, therefore, is knowing how to use it, apply it basis the method of marketing marketers are executing or seeking solutions for, not making the mistake of transposing one type of marketing hypothesis to the other etc. are key factors of being a successful marketer tomorrow.

Take a look:

Mass advertising is like Classical Physics; large-scale, mostly intuitive and somewhat predictable.

Direct Marketing is like Atomic Physics; small/medium-scale, mostly logical, but the segmentation aspects start to show some bumps and troughs on what appeared to be smooth and simple.

Social Media is more like Quantum Physics; small-scale, counter-intuitive and usually unpredictable.

• Traditional marketers deal with everyones opinions in big bins like sales figures, national focus groups, opinion polls, etc. These roll-ups average out the inconsistencies of individuals and blur together to form tendencies, trends and preferences. The actions taken in mass marketing can expect a relatively consistent result (i.e. send out a coupon and you can expect a certain level of redemption and sales revenue to come from it and the larger the audience, the more likely it is to average out at a predictable result). This is the world that marketers are familiar with and all-in-all it makes sense if you know the system.

• Social Media on the other hand acts on the niche and individual level where things are a lot less certain. The complex nature of blog posts is hard to parse out into definitive numbers and trends.The lack of large numbers makes the reaction and result of social media efforts difficult to determine and measure. It is much more difficult to roll up all of these disparate opinions into a meaningful decision than to look at an opinion pie-chart.So in essence, social media tools have given marketers a microscope powerful enough to see what is going on at smaller scales.

...many marketers in the classical camp are not very happy with what they see, because it doesn’t confirm what they thought they knew. Decisions which appear obvious when looking at large sample sizes becomes more nuanced and contradictory when you see everyone as an individual.

How do measure Customer Engagement?

MarketingNPV provides an in-depth point of view on measuring engagement. This is a complex and evolving subject in marketing. The key however is to start small, keep defining & redefining it, see the results and keep improving it all the time. I think customer engagement must include all touchpoints beyond just net, blogs. It should include store visits, branch visits, call centre, product usage, cross-product holding, depth of features & benefits used by the customer etc.

Take a look at how they see it:

Two Types of Engagement

There are two generally accepted engagement “types”: emotional engagement and behavioral engagement. The former is more popular; the latter is more important.

Behavioral Engagement

It’s important to note that behavioral engagement is not limited to a purchase of a product or service; it encompasses all the interactions that a prospect or customer has in relation to a brand. There are any number of pre- or post-sale activities that can be (directly or indirectly) predictive of a future purchase or re-purchase; they include visiting a Web site, downloading a whitepaper, calling customer service, recommending a product, or even commenting on a blog.

There’s plenty of data available to track how customers or prospects are engaging with a company; the key is to synthesize it into a clear model for demonstrating either short- or long-term economic benefit.

To probe more deeply into these drivers, your next step will be to identify places on the map where you have good data and where you don’t. Look beyond the traditional customer survey information, brand-tracking studies, and the CRM system. What Web analytics are you capturing? Do you have access to point-of-sale data or call-center transcripts?

The key to measuring engagement is:

a. Develop a vision
b. Create a methodical testing process
c. Look for predictive validity of upstream behaviours
d. Leverage your engagement drivers

Marketing - How is it changing?

Forrester, has come-up with some research around emerging trends in marketing ( ahead of their Marketing Forum 2008) - Engagement is becoming an important metric. Key highlights include:

Marketing leaders steer based on hard data. Measuring engagement will take the guesswork out of budget allocation. Engagement can drive awareness, transactions, brand preference, and loyalty. But each of these objectives requires a different approach and investment in people, processes, and technology.Marketing leaders from firms like CompUSA and BMW prioritized one goal, chose a very specific set of tools and vendors, and successfully moved the needle on transactions and loyalty, respectively.

Direct marketers and market researchers unearth deep client needs. Leading direct marketers already combine Web clicks with purchase and loyalty data to unearth a consumer's interaction with the brand. But BrandIntel went a step further and recorded the content that users generated and other consumers read.

eCommerce professionals drive online sales with personalization. More than a third of Web visitors will make a purchase after seeing a personalized recommendation. eCommerce professionals can boost online sales with one-to-one personalization.

Customer experience professionals innovate the brand. Whirlpool observed people at home and used the results to develop a new sub-brand -- Gladiator -- with fridges for men in their garages.To meet these uncovered needs, customer experience professionals will develop a disruptive strategy, simplifying the interaction, amplifying the service elements, and repositioning the brand overall.

My view:  Involvement, Interaction, Intimacy & Influence - 4Is as Forrester calls it, needs to be measured by marketers on a regular basis. This will increasingly make marketing more data-led. They need to be building programs around the 4Is using data. It is important that they start fusing transactional data with web data - clicks, blogs, social networks etc. along with customer service data. This will increasingly give marketers a peek preview into how customers feel, think and talk about their products and personalize their marketing efforts basis the degree of engagement they have identified with these set of customers. 

Gartner CRM 2008 Summit

I was just going thro' some reports on the Gartner CRM 2008 summit. There are some highlights which I  saw was not new or earth-shattering but definitely makes a lot of sense to reinforce once more:

• Act on feedback, deploy changes and communicate actions to employees and customers - companies should view every contact with customers as an opportunity to deliver brand values and standardise on the business feedback management tool across the organisation and for all communication channels.
• Design processes from the outside in - most process redesign is done with the objective of improving operational efficiencies rather than to improve the customer experience; which requires the organisation to identify which processes matter most to customers then set about identifying what to improve: an outside-in approach.
• Act as one organisation to ensure consistency - the customer may interact with many parties as part of his or her business with a company. The challenge for the company is to ensure that information gleaned at one interaction is not forgotten in the next channel.
• Be open - organisations that want to improve the customer experience often become more open. Being more open may just mean opening up more channels or opening hours but it can mean much more. For example, some firms establish an environment where customers can support, promote, defend or refer their products and services through an online community.
• Personalise products and experiences - some personalisation options are simple, such as a website that enables customers to monogram products, while others are more complex, such as tailoring and personal pricing.
• Alter attitudes and employee behaviour - employees’ actions are often the most powerful improvements in a customer’s experience. Companies can alter employee behaviour in three primary ways: recruit the right types of employees, ensure standards such as policies, procedures and governance structures, and create training programmes and incentives that can modify employee behaviour patterns.
• Design the complete customer experience - many organisations have no plan or design for the customer experience. Companies with a focus on selling experiences focus on designing experiences. Customers of Disney, for instance, told it that difficulties in leaving the amusement parks often spoilt the experience, so the firm has worked to improve parking and traffic at its facilities.

My View:  The key question really though, is how do we enable all of this in organizations - to me it is about execution-employee focus. I think there is only a small mention on how do we reward, appraise and evaluate employees who should make this happen. This is really where the pieces begin to fall. There are conflicting KRAs in different departments and hence there are no compelling reasons to deliver a consistent customer experience. To put it bluntly, "if it does not hurt, it does not matter!"  This is where it needs to begin and end as the puzzles in the middle are put together!

Personalized communication - Is it lack of data or resolve?

The CMO council in its new global survey, "The Power of Personalization"  has some interesting pointers on potential opportunities that enterprises have in exploting this approach and strategy.

According to the survey:

• Inadequate customer data is the key obstacle facing top marketing executives in their adoption of personalized communication techniques.
• Many CMOs feel the process of developing individualized marketing messages is still largely under-utilized and under-tested.
• More than 55 percent of respondents plan to allocate 10 percent or more of their marketing budgets towards personalized communications, despite their reluctance to declare their personalization efforts successful in the past.
• Many marketers' programs have been deemed unsuccessful because of a lack of actionable customer data used in campaign planning -- as well as because of inadequate analytics used in assessing post-campaign effectiveness.
• 55.1 percent of respondents plan to increase their 2008 marketing budget allocations for personalized communications by more than 10 percent.
• 49.1 percent of respondents blamed "inadequate systems and infrastructure" for limiting personalized communication initiatives.
• "Lack of customer data and insight" and "cost and complexity" were also cited as major contributing factors by 46.2 and 43 percent of respondents, respectively.

My View: I personally believe that many marketing departments in companies are struggling with this new order of availability of customer information, left-brain marketing techniques(viz. analytics) and competency to leverage technology tools. Earlier they had to just "inform", now they need to use customer information to "interact". The traditional job roles and responsibilities need changes, as marketing departments need to have people who understand data, technology and interpret individual customer behaviour.I think marketers must learn to use simple tools, extract whatever data is available and show quick-wins rather than wait for technology infrastructure to be perfect to adopt this approach as they scale-up this kind of marketing. Also, product managers must also have under them customer information managers/ executives who could effectively lead this process. It is also important that the silos in organizations have to be brought together by the CEO to ensure information is used effectively for the enterprise rather than a particular line of business. May be new accounting methods of attributing income, because information of a line of business is used for the other, should be designed for wide adoption of such practices in enterprises.In my opinion, personalized marketing is more than just the 'intent', it is the 'intensity' that can make the needle move!    

Do you onboard your customers?

I am not always excited if somebody tells me I have acquired a new customer. I always look at what is in the plan of the marketing & product teams to make these customers use all the features and benefits of the product, so that these customers can be with them for life. Not too many companies pay attention to onboarding customers. They acquire and forget. Or they pay a lot of attention to how to acquire customers but not do enough review of what is done to keep and grow these customers. Kevin Zimmerman, Sr. Editor, at Peppers & Rogers writes:

Consumer electronics companies and retailers are finding out the hard way what happens when you don't educate customers. Take, for example, the recent situation involving the purchase of popular high-definition televisions (HDTVs). According to Forrester Research Analyst James McQuivey, 20 percent of the sets sold have been returned in some U.S. regions, in large part by consumers who didn't realize what they were buying. Per an ESPN/Knowledge Networks/Statistical Research Inc. study, only 64 percent of homes with an HDTV have HD programming via broadcast or cable, and 13 percent of people who own an HD set do not know if they receive an HD signal. McQuivey forecasts the 20 percent figure will drop moving forward, as more retailers see the need to educate customers about the format if they want to avoid such massive returns.

Who's responsible for customer education?

Henry Choy, senior analyst at Jon Peddie Research says ""The store should do a better job of educating customers, the documentation inside the box must be better, cable companies can get more involved,"..

For a moment, if we as marketers think like customers, then count the number of times we would have read an operating manual, the number times we would have used the features that we primarily bought the product for, the number of times a company that we bought the product from, called to tell you if you have understood the features and used them. In my case, it is close to zero. That's the opportunity waiting to be tapped - Onboard your customers and you will realize there's profits to be made for life.

Do you know how to build analytics from conversational databases?

Peter Kim of Forrester has written a thought-provoking article on the future of the advertising agency. The report argues that consumers now rely less and less on marketing messages when in buying mode. Instead they seek guidance from family, friends and others in their respective communities to guide them toward purchase decisions.

Peter’s views via AdWeek

(Agencies are) “in “a world of hurt” because consumers are tuning out the messages the industry is predicated on producing. Instead, it believes shops need to be organized around communities, not disciplines. What it is calling “the connected agency” would not only know certain communities but also be active members of these groups. Pushing messages would give way to encouraging voluntary engagement, and ongoing conversations would replace time-based campaigns”.

My View:

As communities & conversations become more and more important, there is a need to understand how to build analytical models around huge "conversational  databases" that will emerge. The ability to mine data and conversations together, will become a  huge competitive advantage for service providers. The ones who will succeed are the ones who will be able to overlay the traditional transactional data with conversational data. This is a skill that needs to be built and nurtured if brands and service providers have to succeed in the future.

Why developing customer relationship is so hard

Ron got my attention with a lovely post on this topic. He has some very thought-provoking points on various facets of building customer relationships. He picks-up a quote from John Gottman who says:

“Good relationships aren’t about clear communication — they’re about small moments of attachment and intimacy.”. He gives an example of  a 'small moment' that built a relationship with  a customer -

An IT executive traces his loyalty to USAA back to a single phone call. He called the firm to cancel a credit card and insurance policy. The rep said “I hope I’m not overstepping my boundaries, but we’ve found that many customer often cancel products because of events that aren’t related to USAA like a divorce or other family matter. We’ve set up a special department to help customers with these kinds of matters, is this something we might be able to help you with?” Since he was in the middle of the divorce, he took USAA up on that offer and has been a loyal customer since.

He further writes, Gottman also says that:

“Successful couples look for ways to accentuate the positive. They try to say ‘yes’ as often as possible.”

He writes - Gottman’s comment echoes my sentiment that building a relationship isn’t simply about saying “trust us” but saying (and demonstrating) “we trust you.”

How can one institutionalize this process? - My view:

Companies don't necessarily disagree with this philosophy but the truth is getting it working in the trenches(in the marketplace across channels) - that's always the challenge. Companies need to build a robust Customer Interaction Architecture (CIA) that can capture this "pain point' and 'enable' it with tools and triggers to make a difference. I certainly believe every  transaction or complaint or query is an opportunity to build a "Small Moment Customer Interaction Architecture (SMCIA)'.

To make this happen, there is a need to increasingly integrate technology with every marketing processes.

Treat data with respect

According to a research released by Royal Mail, an estimated 90 per cent of companies fail to exploit data they already hold  on their customers!

It was really disturbing to me as I went thro' some highlights of the report as to how companies value data. In my opinion, in the coming decade, data is going to be every enterprise's only competitive advantage and companies can't take this data casually given the value it can derive, as this research shows.

Take a look at the topline findings:

• Only 15 per cent of companies declare their data as an intangible asset on their balance sheets.
• Data is proven to be a fundamental asset. A firm understanding of a customer database can significantly bolster the bottom line and add value to the company itself, potentially adding millions to a sale price.
• Huw Davis Partnership founder Huw Davis says that clients have increasingly been asking him to value databases over the last few years, and he would recommend more businesses to do so.
• Most companies are getting less than half of the potential value from their customer
  data.

By addressing the data problem, enterprises could potentially increase their value by up to 30 per cent. It is imperative that enterprises look at ways and means to design a customer data strategy road map and extract value from it.

Forrester's ladder of participation and impact on marketing

I was reflecting over the weekend about Forrester's Social Technographics Ladder of Participation. While it was focussed on emerging social technologies, I felt there were some trends, learnings and practices that can be applied from here to refresh marketing thinking, practices, evolving needs to embrace technologies that can make some changes happen and thereby make marketing more relevant to enterprises and CEOs. Let's take a look at this Ladder of Participation first:

I see the marketing eco-system too, taking a very similar shape(with either customers or prospects) in the years to come. The need to 'engage' and run marketing campaigns across a similar ladder is bound to become increasingly important. Marketing will need to 'bucket' its segments of customers or prospects across the spectrum of Inactives to Creators. The 'old world marketing' practice would have stopped with collecters - who I would define as repeat purchasers. Normally, marketing practices would have stopped there.

But, in the 'new world of marketing', customers will be more involved, participative and conversational. Thereby, customers will leave a 'trail of information' behind, in enterprises. For an enterprise, the creators will be the most loyal and demanding. They need to be recognized, valued and encouraged to converse. The ones who do it, will become identifiable and the most important. Also, products/brands will have to become 'information platforms' in such a world. This will also lead to customized design of products and services for them.

The critics are the ones who will have to be 'listened' to. With emerging channels or touch points, the enterprises must open a channel of communication to hear and rectify their problems. They are the ones who can potentially move-up the ladder of participation.

The collectors need to be 'prodded' to talk rather just buy again and again, get them to share their experience and frustrations with the product. And the joiners will have to be moved to become collecters.

This kind of marketing will combine a lot of information, analytical insights, real-time marketing automation to talk to customers in different behavioural states and stages in the ladder. And when enterprises talk of millions and millions of such identified customers or prospects, the need for marketing to deliver scalable, real-time, right-time marketing will only become sacrosanct. The ones who will practice it, will have the ear of CEOs/CFOs and the rest will be left behind.

 

    

NYSE CEO Report 2008 - Focus on the customer

Frank Capek drew my attention to a recent report  on how customers & devoting signifcant executive time on managing customers will be central focus of CEOs during 2008 (Report)

From the executive summary:

”The first theme is that this may be a year in which there is renewed vigor around the customer - 2008 may be a year where many CEOs put the customer at the top of the long list of issues on which they must focus. Why?  Simply stated - customers are at the core of growth.  Here are a few points from this year’s study that are the foundation of this theme:

• CEOs are planning greater investment, both budget and time-wise, on customer relationship management.
• The importance of sales growth as a performance measure has increased since the prior study. Customers are the engine of sales growth.
• Brand, reputation, and investments in corporate social responsibility are more important this year - all efforts that are focused on the winning the hearts and minds of the customer.
• While many CEOs say it is easier to attract customers than it used to be, many, particularly outside the United States, say it is getting harder to retain customers. CEOs recognize that losing customers can be costly.”

Key take-out: It's heartening for me to note that managing customers will be on top of CEOs' agenda. To make it a reality,I think they will have to spend significant time in driving it down the organization - amongst their business heads and their ranks. This has always been a key challenge as there are a lot of issues regarding channel conflicts, change management, marketing budget allocation, linking performance incentives wrt customer management goals, technology investments, profit & cost allocation etc. that will need their focus, to drive this kind of a culture in an organization. Also, they will have to invest significantly in identifying metrics and measurement dashboards around how customers are being managed real time in an enterprise and drive this relentlessly across lifecycle of their customers over the next couple of years once they make a start in 2008.

 

Single view of customers across the enterprise gain attention

While there has been lot of discussions around the need for single view of customers across an enterprise over the last few years, 2008 seems to be a year when this trend could gain a lot of momentum.

Aberdeen Group surveyed over 250 companies to identify the strategies, capabilities and enablers that Best in Class (BIC) companies are using to improve sales and marketing alignment.

Some highlights from the report:

• Best in Class organizations plan to invest in analytics at 1.4-times the rate of the Industry average and 1.7-times the rate of laggards.
• The customer is the core of BIC companies' plans to alleviate the pressure of increasing top-line revenue. Eighty percent (80 percent) of the BIC grate lead qualification and measurement efforts between sales and marketing, compared to 55 percent of laggards. Further, 25 percent of the BIC are preparing to better meet customers' product configuration or personalization needs.
• BIC firms are developing processes around the customer's needs. As customer knowledge and expectations rise, the BIC are adapting. The BIC are 1.9 times more likely than laggards to formalize processes for generating customized proposals, and 1.4 times more likely than laggards to set standards for knowledge sharing between sales and marketing.
• Sixty percent of the BIC currently have cross-functional teams, with an additional 15 percent planning a change.Over one-third of laggards have no plans to implement cross-functional teams. Working side by side facilitates knowledge transfer and increases operational efficiencies. The BIC are also adding operations roles to support sales and marketing. Currently 40 percent of the BIC have these resources in place, and 75 percent of them plan to increase their investment in dedicated personnel next year.

To me it looks like many companies will be putting together a lot of plans around setting-up cross-functional, collaborative teams to enable customer-centricity in their organizations. Also, the need for technology to get a single view of a customer's journey across the enterprise  is becoming more important to extract value/ROI out of marketing investments they are making, is getting a lot of focus amongst CXOs.

Eight predictions for marketing in 2008

We are coming to the end of 2007 and dawn of another new year. It's time for predictions again, I presume! Chief Marketer has some predictions:

1. There will be an ongoing emphasis on “engagement” measures. This is getting harder and harder to measure using models that had already lost their efficacy in 1985, and when you combine that with the power of today’s “bionic” consumers, born hot-wired into the Internet with an iPod in one hand and a TiVo controller in the other, engaging them will be the only way of guaranteeing loyalty and profitability.
2. More “brands” will become “Category Placeholders.” As brands become more and more enamored with and enmeshed in “new” media like social networking and messages beamed into consumers’ living rooms from outer space, marketers need to ensure that their brands actually stand for something in the mind of the consumer.
3. Companies will have to move from saying they’re ”Green” to actually being “Emerald City Green.” Playing in the environmental arena won’t be an option in 2008 and brands and holding companies will have to find ways of positioning their offerings in ways that meaningfully support a sustainable future.
4. Media planning will become more touch point focused and personalized.
   Planners will still classify touch points as “above-the-line,” “below-the-line,” and “new,” but planning will be based on three critical considerations: a) which touch point best reinforces brand values, b) where the brand + media equation yields real engagement, and c) where the plan is seamless, believable, personalized, and authentic.
5. Behavior will (finally) trump attitude.More marketers will come to realize that “to know you is not necessarily to buy you” (or, for that matter, even like you). Loyalty and engagement metrics – particularly those configured to provide brand-to-media engagement measures—will be used to identify behavioral “hot buttons” that marketers can add to their toolboxes and their search efforts.
6. Consumer expectations will once more grow.Brands are only barely keeping up now. Expectations remained stable for a short time, but only while consumers were catching their breadths and adopting –then devouring – the newest of the new technologies and innovations.
7. Personal health management will impact brand engagement and loyalty.U.S. obesity is at an all-time high, with Americans among the fattest people on earth. This increase is primarily the result of consuming more calories, that behavior the direct result of technological innovations making it possible for food to be mass/fast prepared far from the point of consumption, and coconsumed with lower costs of preparation (even if you factor in marketing costs).
8. Innovation and loyalty will matter more. What is clear is that the ever-expanding universe of brands will require an informed action plan – one that makes sense to the people on the brand and marketing side of the equation, but one that also accurately identifies and capitalizes upon what people on the consumer side really feel, really want, and really believe. nsumed with lower costs of preparation (even if you factor in marketing costs).

What are the icons of your customer service?

If you are obsessed with customer-centricity in your organization, it make sense to have some icons that serves as a benchmark for the organization to emulate and live-up to. CRM Buyer has an interesting article on how Lands' End did it:

Motivation can take many forms. At Lands' End these days, it has taken the shape of a London taxicab parked in front of the company's headquarters, its black paint buffed to a mirror-like shine, its grille festooned with a Christmas wreath.

Historic Return Policy

Lands' End, now a division of Sears, has built a reputation for 44 years on customer service. The London taxi, returned by a customer in 2005, has become Lands' End's version of a well-known