Customer World

Lead management - Involve before you start!

A recent study from the Sales Lead Management Association (SLMA)  shows that many companies are ignoring their sales lead management.

Their 2nd annual Sales Lead Management Study, conducted with 144 businesses in Southern California, revealed the following results:

• 68.8% don’t qualify leads before sending them to their sales teams
• 52.4% have no formal process for compiling sales forecast reports
• 82.8% don’t track ROI for lead generation investments
• 55% rated low satisfaction with their SFA/CRM system, at 5 or less on a 10-point scale
• 52.1% use no SFA/CRM system to track the lead process

My View:  The gap between sales & marketing departments has only grown over the years.Sales has had a siloed process in enterprises and in my experience getting sales to see & appreciate good quality leads is always big problem. On the other hand, I have always found, lack of understanding what a good lead is the problem of most lead generation programs. Often there is a mix of science, logic and an intuitive feeling in the salesperson's mind which a software or a process cannot replicate. But, my belief is that right at the inception of a lead generation program, you need to have the buy-in of the sales team. The lead generation team must be 'considered' a part of the sales team and may be that's the reason there's a term coined as 'inside sales'! Nevertheless, the lead generation team, the software and the process must be seamlessly integrated to succeed. It has to start before the program is implemented and announced. That's the key to its success.

CMO council releases study on 'Leveraging Customer Data and Analytics'

Only 50 percent of global marketers report having a strategy for further penetrating or monetizing key account relationships, reports the Chief Marketing Officer (CMO) Council in a new research study, Business Gain From How You Retain . In addition, a surprising 45 percent rate the effectiveness of customer relationship management (CRM) systems as deficient or needing more work, with only 15 percent of companies rating themselves extremely good or effective at integrating disparate customer data sources and repositories.

 

Conducted in late 2007 and early 2008, the CMO Council's Business Gain from How You Retain study undertook a wide-ranging evaluation of where and how marketers are "operationalizing" customer intelligence and insight to reduce customer churn, increase lifetime value, improve the customer experience, and increase the effectiveness and targeting of marketing spend.

More importantly, marketers are struggling to gain a true and timely view of the customer due to inadequate or incompatible IT systems and databases, siloed data in functional areas, and a limited strategic focus or management mandate on Customer Data Integration (CDI). Compounding the issue is a lack of formalized data-sharing policies and practices in the organization, combined with internal political or cultural barriers and IT obstacles and objections to data integration.

 

"We are seeing a fundamental need for marketers to be more effective at tapping the valuable vein of customer data that runs deep inside all organizations," notes Donovan Neale-May, Executive Director of the CMO Council. "Investing in integrated systems that harvest customer insight is critical to driving both marketing and business performance," he adds.

•       Only 15 percent of marketers say their companies are doing an extremely good or effective job of integrating disparate customer data sources and repositories; 55 percent note there is room for improvement or a deficiency in this area.
•      More than 31 percent of companies surveyed had customer churn rates of more than 10 percent and 32 percent reported turnover of five to 10 percent. In comparison, more than 62 percent said they desired or expected a churn level of less than five percent.
•      Respondents believe customer churn significantly impacts business performance through revenue loss (59.9 percent), reduced profitability (39.6 percent) and greater marketing and re-acquisition costs (36.3 percent). 
  
•      While churn is a big issue, nearly 67 percent of those surveyed say they have no system for re-activating dormant or lost customers, while just over half of respondents have a strategy for further penetrating or monetizing key account relationships.

•       While more than 35 percent of respondents report that the CMO or marketing department (38.9 percent) has primary responsibility for the customer analytics function, they are not leveraging its value. Over 31 percent of those surveyed do no data mining at all and 63 percent are only doing moderate levels of data mining for intelligence and insight.

•             The top six strategic applications of customer information by marketers include:

                        - Up-selling and cross-selling
                        - Segmenting and targeting
                        - Driving retention, loyalty and promotional programs
                        - Identifying new opportunities and unmet needs
                        - Improving customer service
                        - Shaping personalized and customized communications

•      Key initiatives to increase customer retention include improving customer communications (65.2 percent); addressing complaints, problems and pain points (51.8 percent); and enhancing the customer experience (54.8 percent). Unfortunately, fewer marketers noted their companies' willingness to modify business practices and policies to accommodate customer needs.

Personalized communication - Is it lack of data or resolve?

The CMO council in its new global survey, "The Power of Personalization"  has some interesting pointers on potential opportunities that enterprises have in exploting this approach and strategy.

According to the survey:

• Inadequate customer data is the key obstacle facing top marketing executives in their adoption of personalized communication techniques.
• Many CMOs feel the process of developing individualized marketing messages is still largely under-utilized and under-tested.
• More than 55 percent of respondents plan to allocate 10 percent or more of their marketing budgets towards personalized communications, despite their reluctance to declare their personalization efforts successful in the past.
• Many marketers' programs have been deemed unsuccessful because of a lack of actionable customer data used in campaign planning -- as well as because of inadequate analytics used in assessing post-campaign effectiveness.
• 55.1 percent of respondents plan to increase their 2008 marketing budget allocations for personalized communications by more than 10 percent.
• 49.1 percent of respondents blamed "inadequate systems and infrastructure" for limiting personalized communication initiatives.
• "Lack of customer data and insight" and "cost and complexity" were also cited as major contributing factors by 46.2 and 43 percent of respondents, respectively.

My View: I personally believe that many marketing departments in companies are struggling with this new order of availability of customer information, left-brain marketing techniques(viz. analytics) and competency to leverage technology tools. Earlier they had to just "inform", now they need to use customer information to "interact". The traditional job roles and responsibilities need changes, as marketing departments need to have people who understand data, technology and interpret individual customer behaviour.I think marketers must learn to use simple tools, extract whatever data is available and show quick-wins rather than wait for technology infrastructure to be perfect to adopt this approach as they scale-up this kind of marketing. Also, product managers must also have under them customer information managers/ executives who could effectively lead this process. It is also important that the silos in organizations have to be brought together by the CEO to ensure information is used effectively for the enterprise rather than a particular line of business. May be new accounting methods of attributing income, because information of a line of business is used for the other, should be designed for wide adoption of such practices in enterprises.In my opinion, personalized marketing is more than just the 'intent', it is the 'intensity' that can make the needle move!    

Why developing customer relationship is so hard

Ron got my attention with a lovely post on this topic. He has some very thought-provoking points on various facets of building customer relationships. He picks-up a quote from John Gottman who says:

“Good relationships aren’t about clear communication — they’re about small moments of attachment and intimacy.”. He gives an example of  a 'small moment' that built a relationship with  a customer -

An IT executive traces his loyalty to USAA back to a single phone call. He called the firm to cancel a credit card and insurance policy. The rep said “I hope I’m not overstepping my boundaries, but we’ve found that many customer often cancel products because of events that aren’t related to USAA like a divorce or other family matter. We’ve set up a special department to help customers with these kinds of matters, is this something we might be able to help you with?” Since he was in the middle of the divorce, he took USAA up on that offer and has been a loyal customer since.

He further writes, Gottman also says that:

“Successful couples look for ways to accentuate the positive. They try to say ‘yes’ as often as possible.”

He writes - Gottman’s comment echoes my sentiment that building a relationship isn’t simply about saying “trust us” but saying (and demonstrating) “we trust you.”

How can one institutionalize this process? - My view:

Companies don't necessarily disagree with this philosophy but the truth is getting it working in the trenches(in the marketplace across channels) - that's always the challenge. Companies need to build a robust Customer Interaction Architecture (CIA) that can capture this "pain point' and 'enable' it with tools and triggers to make a difference. I certainly believe every  transaction or complaint or query is an opportunity to build a "Small Moment Customer Interaction Architecture (SMCIA)'.

To make this happen, there is a need to increasingly integrate technology with every marketing processes.

Forrester's ladder of participation and impact on marketing

I was reflecting over the weekend about Forrester's Social Technographics Ladder of Participation. While it was focussed on emerging social technologies, I felt there were some trends, learnings and practices that can be applied from here to refresh marketing thinking, practices, evolving needs to embrace technologies that can make some changes happen and thereby make marketing more relevant to enterprises and CEOs. Let's take a look at this Ladder of Participation first:

I see the marketing eco-system too, taking a very similar shape(with either customers or prospects) in the years to come. The need to 'engage' and run marketing campaigns across a similar ladder is bound to become increasingly important. Marketing will need to 'bucket' its segments of customers or prospects across the spectrum of Inactives to Creators. The 'old world marketing' practice would have stopped with collecters - who I would define as repeat purchasers. Normally, marketing practices would have stopped there.

But, in the 'new world of marketing', customers will be more involved, participative and conversational. Thereby, customers will leave a 'trail of information' behind, in enterprises. For an enterprise, the creators will be the most loyal and demanding. They need to be recognized, valued and encouraged to converse. The ones who do it, will become identifiable and the most important. Also, products/brands will have to become 'information platforms' in such a world. This will also lead to customized design of products and services for them.

The critics are the ones who will have to be 'listened' to. With emerging channels or touch points, the enterprises must open a channel of communication to hear and rectify their problems. They are the ones who can potentially move-up the ladder of participation.

The collectors need to be 'prodded' to talk rather just buy again and again, get them to share their experience and frustrations with the product. And the joiners will have to be moved to become collecters.

This kind of marketing will combine a lot of information, analytical insights, real-time marketing automation to talk to customers in different behavioural states and stages in the ladder. And when enterprises talk of millions and millions of such identified customers or prospects, the need for marketing to deliver scalable, real-time, right-time marketing will only become sacrosanct. The ones who will practice it, will have the ear of CEOs/CFOs and the rest will be left behind.